by Joe Walker
Noted Texas Civil War Docent, Reenactor and
Expert
During the Civil War, two revolvers stood out as favorites on both sides: the Colt Army Model 1860 and Remington Model 1863. Although both sides used those two revolvers, the Confederate Cavalry favored the Colt while their Union counterparts used the Remington. Overall, the Colt was the primary revolver for both sides.
Notable Differences
The 1863 Remington and the 1860 Colt Army have two notable differences. First, the Remington has the "top strap" designed frame that covers the cylinder, as well as connecting the barrel to the frame. The Colt cylinder has an "open top". Second, the Colt’s entire barrel assembly is held to the rest of the weapon by a small, flat "wedge" in the barrel frame and held tight to the cylinder pin with a small tension screw. By removing the wedge and screw, the barrel can be removed before removing the cylinder. The Remington has a long thick pin between the loading lever and barrel. These two design features have their own pros and cons. The Colt wedge and screw is easily dropped, lost, or worn. The Remington has a larger more secure pin that is harder to lose, but more difficult to handle when removing the cylinder.
In Combat
Both weapons are heavy- around 2-1/2 pounds, with the Remington a bit heavier. They are obliviously meant for mounted service; these monsters, along with their ammo, could fatigue most men if worn on the march. However, they both supply the .44 cal. "killing" power as opposed to the widely used .36 cal. 1851 Colt "Six Shooter" obtained mostly by civilians before they enlisted.
I have owned and have live-fired originals of both guns, as well as the smaller Colt Navy. It is quite evident why soldiers carried few if any extra loaded cylinders if in the mounted service. In close combat, you CANNOT remove and replace a cylinder on horseback, next to impossible on a jumping horse. Both weapons would have been using pre-made paper cartridges supplied in “arsenal packs” that are stuffed by fingers into the front of the cylinder and rammed home by the loading lever. Grease, used to lubricate the cylinder chambers before loading conical balls, would most likely be omitted. Adding to the difficulty, percussion caps would still have to carefully be placed on each cylinder nipple. Dismounted, loading under fire was difficult, but possible, especially if unhampered by powder flasks, lose balls, and grease.
Fighting dismounted using carbines and rifles
became the most common tactic on defense and skirmishing for the Cavalry. The revolver
was seldom used. Both the Colt and Remington had “accurate” ranges of around
25-30 yards. To improve accuracy, the Colt had one extra land and grove in the
barrel. Though more than the Remington, it made little difference. The Colt
never had a rear mounted sight, which attests to the lack of “long range”
accuracy. However, many original Colts can be seen with a small notch on the
top of the hammer that will align with the front sight when cocked. The
Remington had a groove in the top strap of the frame with no notch on the
hammer making it more effective for long range use.
Conclusion
Comparing the two, my overall opinion is they measure close to equal, with the 1863 Remington edging out the Colt Army due to a stronger frame design and overall loading ease during combat. Despite their differences, a trooper wouldn't hesitate to use the butt or barrel of either in a melee! By 1864, any new issues to Union troopers were usually Remingtons, and the Rebs were still hanging on to their Colts and Southern manufactured revolvers.